emacs: 24.2

required by emacs:
  libotf
  mn17n

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 90 deletions

diff --git a/abs/extra/emacs/glibc_gets.patch b/abs/extra/emacs/glibc_gets.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 26b71f6..0000000
--- a/abs/extra/emacs/glibc_gets.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,90 +0,0 @@
---- emacs-24.1-orig/lib/gnulib.mk
-+++ emacs-24.1/lib/gnulib.mk
-@@ -599,7 +624,6 @@
- 	      -e 's/@''GNULIB_GETCHAR''@/$(GNULIB_GETCHAR)/g' \
- 	      -e 's/@''GNULIB_GETDELIM''@/$(GNULIB_GETDELIM)/g' \
- 	      -e 's/@''GNULIB_GETLINE''@/$(GNULIB_GETLINE)/g' \
--	      -e 's/@''GNULIB_GETS''@/$(GNULIB_GETS)/g' \
- 	      -e 's/@''GNULIB_OBSTACK_PRINTF''@/$(GNULIB_OBSTACK_PRINTF)/g' \
- 	      -e 's/@''GNULIB_OBSTACK_PRINTF_POSIX''@/$(GNULIB_OBSTACK_PRINTF_POSIX)/g' \
- 	      -e 's/@''GNULIB_PCLOSE''@/$(GNULIB_PCLOSE)/g' \
---- emacs-24.1-orig/lib/stdio.in.h
-+++ emacs-24.1/lib/stdio.in.h
-@@ -699,22 +699,11 @@
- # endif
- #endif
- 
--#if @GNULIB_GETS@
--# if @REPLACE_STDIO_READ_FUNCS@ && @GNULIB_STDIO_H_NONBLOCKING@
--#  if !(defined __cplusplus && defined GNULIB_NAMESPACE)
--#   undef gets
--#   define gets rpl_gets
--#  endif
--_GL_FUNCDECL_RPL (gets, char *, (char *s) _GL_ARG_NONNULL ((1)));
--_GL_CXXALIAS_RPL (gets, char *, (char *s));
--# else
--_GL_CXXALIAS_SYS (gets, char *, (char *s));
--#  undef gets
--# endif
--_GL_CXXALIASWARN (gets);
- /* It is very rare that the developer ever has full control of stdin,
--   so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning.  Assume it is
--   always declared, since it is required by C89.  */
-+   so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning; besides, C11
-+   removed it.  */
-+#undef gets
-+#if HAVE_RAW_DECL_GETS
- _GL_WARN_ON_USE (gets, "gets is a security hole - use fgets instead");
- #endif
- 
-@@ -1054,9 +1043,9 @@
- # endif
- #endif
- 
--/* Some people would argue that sprintf should be handled like gets
--   (for example, OpenBSD issues a link warning for both functions),
--   since both can cause security holes due to buffer overruns.
-+/* Some people would argue that all sprintf uses should be warned about
-+   (for example, OpenBSD issues a link warning for it),
-+   since it can cause security holes due to buffer overruns.
-    However, we believe that sprintf can be used safely, and is more
-    efficient than snprintf in those safe cases; and as proof of our
-    belief, we use sprintf in several gnulib modules.  So this header
---- emacs-24.1-orig/m4/stdio_h.m4
-+++ emacs-24.1/m4/stdio_h.m4
-@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
--# stdio_h.m4 serial 40
-+# stdio_h.m4 serial 41
- dnl Copyright (C) 2007-2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
- dnl This file is free software; the Free Software Foundation
- dnl gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it,
-@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
-   GNULIB_GETC=1
-   GNULIB_GETCHAR=1
-   GNULIB_FGETS=1
--  GNULIB_GETS=1
-   GNULIB_FREAD=1
-   dnl This ifdef is necessary to avoid an error "missing file lib/stdio-read.c"
-   dnl "expected source file, required through AC_LIBSOURCES, not found". It is
-@@ -72,10 +71,10 @@
- 
-   dnl Check for declarations of anything we want to poison if the
-   dnl corresponding gnulib module is not in use, and which is not
--  dnl guaranteed by C89.
-+  dnl guaranteed by both C89 and C11.
-   gl_WARN_ON_USE_PREPARE([[#include <stdio.h>
--    ]], [dprintf fpurge fseeko ftello getdelim getline pclose popen renameat
--    snprintf tmpfile vdprintf vsnprintf])
-+    ]], [dprintf fpurge fseeko ftello getdelim getline gets pclose popen
-+    renameat snprintf tmpfile vdprintf vsnprintf])
- ])
- 
- AC_DEFUN([gl_STDIO_MODULE_INDICATOR],
-@@ -113,7 +112,6 @@
-   GNULIB_GETCHAR=0;              AC_SUBST([GNULIB_GETCHAR])
-   GNULIB_GETDELIM=0;             AC_SUBST([GNULIB_GETDELIM])
-   GNULIB_GETLINE=0;              AC_SUBST([GNULIB_GETLINE])
--  GNULIB_GETS=0;                 AC_SUBST([GNULIB_GETS])
-   GNULIB_OBSTACK_PRINTF=0;       AC_SUBST([GNULIB_OBSTACK_PRINTF])
-   GNULIB_OBSTACK_PRINTF_POSIX=0; AC_SUBST([GNULIB_OBSTACK_PRINTF_POSIX])
-   GNULIB_PCLOSE=0;               AC_SUBST([GNULIB_PCLOSE])